top of page

Reimagining Timetables: Letting Learning Lead the Way

  • Mar 18
  • 3 min read

Updated: Apr 23

By Mel Evans, Co-Founder, The EduShift Collective


Timetabling has long been seen as a logistical puzzle, a careful arrangement of subjects, teachers, and time slots that dictates the rhythm of school life. But what if we flipped this mindset? What if, instead of scheduling learning around the timetable, we let learning itself determine the schedule?


Lou Deibe, a valued friend of The EduShift Collective, offers a powerful provocation:

"Timetabling, or scheduling learning, needs a flip of mindset from the educator—whose job is now to let the children's learning lead the way. Our role as teachers is to know the curriculum so deeply, so that we can hang it on what we are seeing, rather than letting the curriculum drive the learning. We need to be asking the right questions, provoking, challenging where our learners are taking things and letting them lead the way."

This shift in thinking challenges one of the most ingrained structures in education: the idea that curriculum dictates learning. Instead, Lou’s perspective invites us to reimagine our role as educators, not as gatekeepers of knowledge but as skilled observers and facilitators who curate and contextualise learning experiences based on what emerges in our classrooms.


Letting Learning Take the Lead


Imagine a school where deep student inquiry into sustainability emerges organically from a local environmental issue. In a traditional model, we might first look at the timetable to see where science, geography, or English fit into the equation. In a more contemporary model, we would instead lean into students’ curiosity, allowing their questions and discoveries to guide which curriculum elements become relevant.


This approach requires a shift in both mindset and practice:

  • Knowing the Curriculum Deeply: When teachers truly understand the curriculum, they can weave it seamlessly into student-led inquiries rather than forcing students into pre-set boxes.

  • Becoming Architects of Learning: Instead of rigidly structuring content delivery, educators facilitate, scaffold, and provoke deeper thinking, ensuring that meaningful learning emerges.

  • Valuing Flexibility and Responsiveness: Schools must embrace adaptable structures that enable shifts in time allocation, interdisciplinary learning, and emergent projects.


The Role of Questions, Provocation, and Challenge

A flipped approach to timetabling also shifts the teacher’s role towards one of inquiry and provocation. Instead of delivering predetermined content, we ask questions that extend student thinking:


  • What do you notice about this problem?

  • Why do you think this is happening?

  • How could we test that idea?

  • Who else might have insights on this?

  • What skills or knowledge do we need to explore this further?


By leading with curiosity, we honour students as co-constructors of knowledge. We also allow them to develop the skills they need for an unpredictable future, critical thinking, adaptability, and deep engagement with complex problems.


Designing Schools for Learning, Not Just Teaching

If we take this approach seriously, we also need to rethink how schools are designed. Traditional timetables, with their fixed subjects and bell-driven transitions, can be a barrier to authentic learning experiences. Instead, schools might explore:


  • Flexible scheduling that allows time to flow according to the needs of student inquiry.

  • Interdisciplinary collaboration where teachers work together across subjects to support real-world learning.

  • Micro-credentialing and personalised learning pathways that allow students to showcase learning in diverse ways.


Are We Ready for the Flip?

This is not an easy shift. It requires leadership courage, teacher trust, and a willingness to experiment. But if we truly want to prepare students for a complex and dynamic world, then we must be willing to rethink the structures that shape their learning experiences.


The challenge is before us: Will we continue to let the timetable dictate learning? Or will we embrace the flip, letting learning lead the way, and hanging the curriculum onto what we see unfolding?


We’d love to hear your thoughts. How is your school reimagining timetabling to empower student-led learning?



 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page